The Danger of Relying on the Child Ego State in Transactional Analysis

Written by John Dray

I am a trainee psychotherapist working with compassion and affirmation within the LGBTQ+ community.

3rd April 2025

The Danger of Relying on the Child Ego State in Transactional Analysis

John Lanchester’s quote in Whoops! about the perils of relying on misleading information provides a compelling analogy for the dangers of being overly dependent on the Child Ego State in Transactional Analysis (TA).

‘You’re worse off relying on misleading information than on not having any information at all. If you give a pilot an altimeter that is sometimes defective he will crash the plane. Give him nothing and he will look out the window. Technology is only safe if it is flawless.’

Just as a faulty altimeter misguides a pilot, the unchecked dominance of the Child Ego State can distort perception, emotional responses, and decision-making. In contrast, engaging the Adult Ego State acts as a corrective mechanism, akin to looking out of the window to verify reality.

Understanding the Child Ego State

In TA, the Child Ego State encompasses the emotions, thoughts, and behaviours rooted in early experiences. This state is divided into:

  • The Free Child – spontaneous, creative, joyful, and playful.
  • The Adapted Child – conforming, rebellious, or overly compliant in response to parental influences.

The Child Ego State is essential for emotional depth, playfulness, and connection. However, when relied upon excessively—especially without the guidance of the Adult Ego State—it can lead to impulsive, emotionally reactive, or distorted decision-making.

The Risks of Over-Reliance on the Child Ego State

  • Emotional Reactivity Over Rational Thinking

 

Without the stabilising influence of the Adult Ego State, a person operating predominantly from the Child Ego State may react impulsively to situations based on past emotional experiences rather than current reality. This can lead to misinterpretations, heightened emotional responses, and difficulty in conflict resolution.

  • Distorted Perception of Reality

 

Just as a defective altimeter gives the illusion of altitude while misleading the pilot, an unchecked Child Ego State can present a skewed view of reality. For instance, someone experiencing rejection may default to childhood abandonment fears rather than assessing the situation through a rational lens.

  • Avoidance of Responsibility

 

Operating primarily from the Free Child can lead to difficulty in taking responsibility for actions, while the Adapted Child may become excessively submissive or rebellious. Without the Adult Ego State, decisions may be based on avoidance, appeasement, or defiance rather than thoughtful consideration.

  • Decision-Making Based on Past Scripts

 

Transactional Analysis posits that early life experiences shape our life scripts—repetitive patterns of thinking and behaving. If decisions are driven purely by the Child Ego State, individuals may unknowingly replay outdated patterns rather than adapting to new circumstances with an Adult perspective.

Integrating the Adult Ego State

The Adult Ego State functions like a skilled pilot verifying information. It gathers data from the present, considers multiple perspectives, and makes rational, informed decisions. Balancing the Child Ego State with the Adult ensures:

  • Emotional Awareness with Rational Control – Feelings are acknowledged but not allowed to dictate reactions.
  • Adaptability – Decisions are based on current realities rather than outdated emotional scripts.
  • Self-Reflection – The Adult Ego State allows a person to question automatic responses and adjust behaviour accordingly.

Case Study: A Therapeutic Perspective

Consider a client named Alex, who struggles with confrontation. When a colleague provides constructive criticism, Alex’s immediate response is one of defensiveness, feeling attacked (Adapted Child). Without engaging the Adult Ego State, they might either lash out or withdraw, repeating an old pattern. However, when encouraged to access the Adult Ego State, Alex pauses, considers the feedback objectively, and responds with curiosity rather than emotional reactivity. This shift transforms interactions and leads to healthier relationships.

Conclusion

Just as a flawed instrument can lead a pilot astray, relying solely on the Child Ego State without engaging the Adult Ego State risks emotional turbulence and distorted perceptions. The key to psychological resilience in TA lies in integrating both, ensuring that while emotions are acknowledged, they are navigated with the clarity of reason. By cultivating awareness of our ego states, we enhance our ability to make informed, balanced decisions—steering our personal and relational lives with both wisdom and authenticity.